As engineers, we all chase leverage. Over the past two years AI copilots have become mine. They help me move from idea to production faster without sacrificing code quality, and they give me back time to focus on the parts of engineering that truly need a human.
Before I touch the keyboard, I ask the copilot to outline an architecture.md file. That template always includes:
Seeing the system laid out forces me to challenge assumptions and makes the first implementation pass dramatically smoother.
Last quarter I refactored a brittle 5,000-line API. With AI support I received in under 10 minutes:
Here is the baseline request I issue to generate that architecture.md whenever I start a new project or touch legacy code:
You are a senior software engineer. Based on the current project files (source code, configs, documentation, etc.), generate a comprehensive `architecture.md` file in Markdown format, including the following sections:
- System overview
- Main technologies (languages, frameworks, databases, third-party tools, etc.)
- Component breakdown (frontend, backend, APIs, background workers, etc.)
- Data flows and API design
- Security (authentication, authorization, best practices)
- Operations (deployments, monitoring, alerting)
- Risks and mitigation strategies
When AI takes care of the heavy lifting, I get to spend my time validating trade-offs, pairing with teammates, and building the features that move the business.
I've adopted an incremental development method I call the "Edit-Test cycle":
This approach keeps me focused and avoids endless debugging sessions.
I've learned that the quality of AI responses depends directly on the quality of my prompts. My golden rules:
@filename command to include necessary filesA good prompt is like a good brief: clear, concise, and actionable.
Beyond Cursor, I've explored several tools that transform how I code:
YOLO mode allows Cursor to:
The @ commands are magical for quickly including context and documentation.
Careful, AI isn't magic. Here are common mistakes I've learned to avoid:
Problem: Blindly accepting all suggestions. Solution: Always verify and understand generated code
Problem: AI can invent functions or APIs that don't exist. Solution: Systematically test and check documentation
Problem: Off-topic responses due to lack of information. Solution: Re-prompt with more or less context as needed
Problem: Generated code may contain vulnerabilities. Solution: Mandatory security review on all sensitive code
Since integrating AI into my workflow:
In 2025, AI no longer just assists developers: it orchestrates and automates the entire workflow, freeing considerable time for innovation.
I'm convinced that AI won't replace developers yet, but in the future, it could radically transform our profession. For now, it's an intelligent assistant that:
What remains important is our ability to design, architect, and make the right decisions. AI is simply the tool that allows us to realize our ideas faster.
Here are 3 concrete actions to integrate AI into your workflow:
AI has transformed how I code. It's no longer a question of whether we should use it, but how to use it well. By adopting a structured approach and understanding the strengths and limitations of these tools, we can truly multiply our productivity while maintaining control over code quality.
The key to success? Stay critical and curious. AI is a powerful tool, but it's our expertise that makes the difference between mediocre code and excellent code.
What about you, which AI feature has revolutionized your way of coding?